Quality of psd to html services

January 13th, 2009

Surfing the web you probably met many companies which offer psd to html, implementation and development services. They always pretend to have extremely high quality of their code and search engine optimization.

Obviously the company’s website should represent the same quality so we decided to test several popular websites in this area and share the results with readers of our blog.

In this section we will provide tests and publish results. To rate each site we will use 100-point ranking and use a few criteria:

  • valid html: 12 points
  • valid css: 10 points
  • search engine optimized xhtml: 15 points
  • inline javascript absence: 5 points
  • no bugs in FF3: 5 points
  • no bugs in FF2: 9 points
  • no bugs in IE6: 15 points
  • no bugs in IE7: 12 points
  • no bugs in Safari: 11 points
  • no bugs in Opera: 6 points

We are going to test the sites from the list below and publish the results soon:

Of course this list is far from complete and we’ll be adding more companies later. You are welcome to post a suggestion for testing any of existing services you know in comments to this post. We hope this investigation will be interesting for you.

3 Responses to “Quality of psd to html services”

  1. Philip Bergman:

    How are you going to test these sites? Will you give them all the same sample design layout to create markup from? Sounds expensive!

    Regards,

    Philip Bergman

  2. Konstantin Boyko:

    Philip, you’re right, that’s expensive. But every service has already completed example of their work - their website. And it is supposed to be perfectly coded in order to be respected by customers. It was interesting for us to see if they all really have perfect code and we want to share the results of our investigation with publicity.

  3. wedoxhtml:

    Thanks for listing my site here, please contact us for any query and support.

Leave a Reply

  • XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <pre lang="" line="">